<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Mystic Ranger - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-b9862a94" type="application/json"/><link>http://themysticranger.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="http://themysticranger.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:54:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: About speech and symbols</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2012/05/about-speech-and-symbols/#comment-524534379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh you just have to look at comic books where they attempt to put sounds into words to know about more sounds that cannot be spelled. How about the br-thr kinda sound when you expel air through your mouth while keeping your jaws closed and lips loose? If ya know what I mean.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, despite Devnagari covering consonants more successfully than English, there's always the 'pen'-'pain' thing which you cannot differentiate between when written in Hindi. There's only one way to write both words.&lt;br&gt;I've always wondered the same about Mandarin. There are tons of new words being invented everyday (mostly in English O.o), how do they ever express those?! And how about words like 'doordarshan' in Hindi, how did they come up with that? Who decided it was the right word for it? It's a relatively new invention, compared to the invention of the language.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Espèra</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Being a global communicator</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2012/04/being-a-global-communicator/#comment-513992633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That seems like an awesome thing to work on.&lt;br&gt;So does pyscholinguistics have to do with learning language, understanding language, or understanding how people listen to/comprehend language? That observation made the last seem most special to me - that people instinctively *hear* the same things differently. I was also thinking about the construction of languages, on that joke by Russell Peters about !Xobile, if you've heard that one. Would love to meet up some time (though I'm not into beer and such, yet. :P).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mystic Ranger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:40:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Titled: Rant</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2012/04/titled-rant/#comment-509133167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Er.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I didn't think this would be published under my name. Can you please read these comments and then delete them?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I shall take care to comment using an appropriate 'Comment As' next time.&lt;br&gt;Thanks. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sampoorna Biswas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:50:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Being a global communicator</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2012/04/being-a-global-communicator/#comment-495789331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Grab a beer with me some day when we meet again cholo. Psycholinguistics and speech recognition is what I've been doing research projects on and if I ever plan to take up research later this is probably what I'll do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ankur Banerjee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:41:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Save the planet?!</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2011/05/save-the-planet/#comment-326175538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hell Yeah! Agreed! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dibya</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:00:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evolution of the Ampersand</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2011/06/the-evolution-of-the-ampersand/#comment-326174440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, Its you who makes the '&amp;amp;' different every time you write it with your hand(Sometimes, Handwriting matters ;)). Anyway, I enjoyed this. Thanks..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dibya&lt;br&gt;(TheWackyHeads)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dibya</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:55:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Got Mac</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2011/06/got-mac/#comment-315796152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You've shared a nice article! thanks a lot for this post :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Digital Printing Machines</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 04:56:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evolution of the Ampersand</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2011/06/the-evolution-of-the-ampersand/#comment-282127448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you referring to the attached image? It looks very pretty to me, but it seems rather similar to all the 'modern' i.e. relatively recent variations of the ampersand. They have broken apart from the structure which generally has the visible 't', but I would believe that is because they weren't trying to be etymologically coherent. They were trying to make the existing variation which looks more like a mirror reflection of a cursive 'S', pretty. Would you differ in your opinion or thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mystic Ranger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evolution of the Ampersand</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2011/06/the-evolution-of-the-ampersand/#comment-277467939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;tell more about the Bickham script - it's radically different.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Odonovandn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:14:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Map — II</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/07/my-map-ii/#comment-76858231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does a line have breadth? Nope. They have &lt;i&gt;apparent&lt;/i&gt; breadth, but don't the latitudes and longitudes have that too? They are lines, after all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mystic Ranger</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:11:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Map — II</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/07/my-map-ii/#comment-76755033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually to thing of it, even the axes have some breadth, so they aren't exactly perfect either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:19:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My own Map</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/05/my-own-map/#comment-51890502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;* clueless *&lt;br&gt;iLike the pictures, though :P&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ha ha humanities... ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devika</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 08:24:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chat Noir — A game</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/05/chat-noir-a-game/#comment-51890057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes Yes. The new theme. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devika</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 08:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chat Noir — A game</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/05/chat-noir-a-game/#comment-51585036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Talking weirdly? That would be a vast understatement. If you're referring to the new theme, thanks. And if not, I really didn't get what you said. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mystic Ranger</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 09:51:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chat Noir — A game</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/05/chat-noir-a-game/#comment-51354036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;oho&lt;br&gt;swankaye!!&lt;br&gt;I'm referring, ofcourse, to your home page that it most delightfully altered. Am I talking weirdly? I blame SAT.&lt;br&gt;New Post! New Post! New Post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devika</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 08:15:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Mathematical Crusade</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2009/12/the-mathematical-crusade/#comment-49389109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice work dude! Still didn't know that you are officially the Tech Khopdi. :P&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Btw, when was this posted? Is the date on the top right - right?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vineesh&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Your loser bro</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chat Noir — A game</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/05/chat-noir-a-game/#comment-49187455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope it wasn't. I've won it multiple times too. The thing is, I can't say I'll win for sure. I want to know how to always win. It's somewhat easy to guess the cat's move. But I can't always win (as I've already stated). I want to know how to do that. (go to the &lt;a href="http://www.gamedesign.jp/flash/chatnoir/chatnoir.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;gamedesign.jp site&lt;/a&gt;, and keep on playing. And tell me if you're some awesome champ at it. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mystic Ranger</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 05:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chat Noir — A game</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/05/chat-noir-a-game/#comment-49187454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That wasn't too hard: &lt;a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/74874/catnoir.png" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://dl.dropbox.com/u/74874...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aditya Mukherjee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:04:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nature by Numbers</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/04/nature-by-numbers/#comment-49187450</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ahhh...&lt;br&gt;The Good Ole Golden Ratio :)&lt;br&gt;Awesome Video Though.&lt;br&gt;I'm eager to know what s/w he used to make it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Achal Varma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:11:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Major Joke: That kid makes up questions for himself, and even those he can’t solve</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/04/major-joke-that-kid-makes-up-questions-for-himself-and-even-those-he-cant-solve/#comment-49187448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How do IIT questions make you think about integration? :O&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Espera</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:15:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Major Joke: That kid makes up questions for himself, and even those he can’t solve</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/04/major-joke-that-kid-makes-up-questions-for-himself-and-even-those-he-cant-solve/#comment-49187447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And I was anyways looking forward to that! o.O&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mystic Ranger</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:19:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Major Joke: That kid makes up questions for himself, and even those he can’t solve</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/04/major-joke-that-kid-makes-up-questions-for-himself-and-even-those-he-cant-solve/#comment-49187446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mathematicians are such a despondent lot... if it's not an apology, it's a lament...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But seriously, amen. The full realization, though, comes only with integration. And then IIT questions. Which make you *think* about *integration*. Bit of a shocker the first time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prachi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weird Al — You’re Pitiful</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/03/weird-al-youre-pitiful/#comment-39373559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice. :D This one is _awesome_. Try out Constipated. Or Ode to a Superhero. Or, even Yoda. I kinda like the fact that Weird Al's got a lot of songs based on Star Wars. :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sakshigupta</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:03:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weird Al — You’re Pitiful</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/03/weird-al-youre-pitiful/#comment-49187442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And the other one I like, is &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5DHFwHf9XU" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bomb Saddam&lt;/a&gt;. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mystic Ranger</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:57:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weird Al — You’re Pitiful</title><link>http://blog.visheshk.net/2010/03/weird-al-youre-pitiful/#comment-37453340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice one...loved it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek Nair</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:19:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
